Case studies

Dasceq AI Rhythm Technology (DART) Proprietary System solves your BIGGEST PROBLEM

How do I maximize portfolio profitability?​

DART improves collection efficiency up to 40+% and improves dollars collected by up to 5% so that you achieve significant cost reduction today and collect more $$. ​

​DART leverages breakthrough technological analytics to intimately UNDERSTAND CUSTOMER BEHAVIORS. We deliver daily recommendations to your team and you execute on the plan, which translates into better customer experience, a significant reduction in the cost to collect an account and more dollars collected.  ​

 

Case Study 1: REDUCED COST OF COLLECTIONS BY 30% for Auto 

A short-term sub-prime installment loan provider with 100+ stores and a significant online presence with outstanding loans of $500MM+. ​

They were making 3 calls per day to all their delinquent accounts. They took one week to set up DART.  With a simple champion/ challenger strategy they were able to improve efficiency by reducing the need for collectors by 15% in the first month and by 20% in the second month. They reduced their cost of collection by 30% (i.e. reduced the total number of collector hours by 30%+ within 3 months) without any impact to the $$ collected. ​

Case Study 2: REDUCED COST OF COLLECTION 40%

A sub-prime installment finance company with a $300MM+ portfolio.​

They had 100+ collectors and implemented DART. They set up a champion challenger on a small sample for the first month and after the success, they moved 100% of the portfolio to Dasceq recommendations saving them 40% effort on collections and reducing their staff by 40%+​

Case Study 3: REDUCED COST OF COLLECTIONS BY 30% for near-prime and subprime auto portfolio

A near-prime auto finance company with a $5+Bn portfolio: ​

They were making 3 calls per day to all their delinquent accounts. They took one week to set-up DART.  With a simple champion/ challenger strategy they were able to improve efficiency by reducing the need for collectors by 15% in the first month and by 20% in the second month. They reduced their cost of collection by 30% (i.e. reduced the total number of collector hours by 30%+ within 3 months) without any impact to the $$ collected. ​

Case Study 4: REDUCED COST OF COLLECTION 40% for a subprime auto portfolio

A sub-prime auto finance company with a $300MM+ portfolio:

They had 80+ collectors and implemented DART. They set up a champion challenger on a small sample for the first month and after the success, they moved 100% of the portfolio to Dasceq recommendations saving them 40% effort on collections and reducing their staff by 40%+